Legal Opinion

Turner v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 11, 1928No. 11279PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for burglary, punishment being twelve years in the penitentiary.

We find it necessary to discuss only the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to corroborate the testimony of an admitted accomplice. Art. 718, C. C. P. (1925), positively prohibits a conviction upon the testimony of an accomplice unless corroborated by other evidence tending to connect accused with the commission of the offense. The test as to the sufficiency of the corroboration long recognized as correct by our courts is to eliminate from- consideration the evidence of the accomplice and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. O'Connor v. VineyardTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Durham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Meyer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Chavira v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
  2. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
  3. McInnis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Barnes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Gary v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API