Legal Opinion

People v. Morobel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 16, 2000PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: In light of the five factors set forth in People v Taranovich (37 NY2d 442, 445), we conclude that Supreme Court properly denied the motion of defendant to dismiss the indictment based on the alleged violation of his constitutional right to a speedy trial (see, CPL 30.20). Although 18 months elapsed between the date of defendant’s arrest and the scheduled trial date, the charges involved class A-l felonies, 15 defendants, and a multi-county drug trafficking investigation. While defendant was incarcerated for the entire period, most of the delay was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. TaranovichNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. BlakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. People v. CharlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. People v. ThorpeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. GrangerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. People v. ManuelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. People v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. GRANGER, SHAWN G., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. HILL, DIARRA, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API