Legal Opinion

H.E. Butt Grocery Co. v. Currier

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided April 28, 1994No. 13-94-126-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

H.E. Butt Grocery Company brings this appeal from a severed order compelling discovery. In reviewing the record for appellate jurisdiction, we conclude that the trial court abused its discretion by severing the discovery order. The severance is invalid, therefore, there exists no final judgment. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Chrystal Currier sued H.E.B. for negligence asserting a premises liability claim following her slip and fall in the Raymondville H.E.B. grocery store.

Currier filed a motion to compel discovery of documents, for court ordered…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. North East Independent School District v. AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Guaranty Federal Savings Bank v. Horseshoe Operating Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. StreetTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Felderhoff v. KnaufTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Borden, Inc. v. Valdez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. De Ayala v. MacKieTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Nicor Exploration Co. v. Florida Gas Transmission Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1995
  3. Forlano v. Joyner, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  4. Jones v. American Flood Research, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
  5. David Simpson v. Trinity Universal Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API