Legal Opinion
Borden, Inc. v. Valdez
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided June 15, 1989No. 13-89-186-CVPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
UTTER, Justice.
This is a discovery mandamus proceeding. Relators, Borden, Inc., and James Guffey, seek a writ of mandamus directing the Honorable Rogelio Valdez, Judge of the 357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, to rescind his order commanding Keith King to appear for a deposition and produce various items, or in the alternative, to modify his order to provide that Keith King may only be deposed in Franklin County, Ohio. We deny the writ of mandamus in part and conditionally grant the writ of mandamus in part.
Jose Homer De La Rosa, the real party in interest and plaintiff…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jampole v. TouchyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- West v. SolitoTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Garcia v. PeeplesTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Duval County Ranch Co. v. Alamo Lumber Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1983
- Turbodyne Corp. v. HeardTexas Supreme Court · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Cheniere Energy, Inc., Charif Souki, Individually, and Greg Rayford, Individually v. Azin Lotfi, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014
- Nine Greenway Ltd. v. Heard, Goggan, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
- In Re J.J.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Sherman v. Triton Energy Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
- H.E. Butt Grocery Co. v. Currier, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.