Legal Opinion

Byer v. Smith

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1984No. Docket Nos. 71113, 71229, (Calendar Nos. 10, 11)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

The no-fault automobile liability act abolishes tort liability for noneconomic loss unless the physical injury is as severe as death, permanent serious disfigurement, or serious impairment of body function. The question presented is whether a person who is seriously impaired in body function may recover damages for pain and suffering and other sequelae of the injury after the impairment is no longer serious. We hold that he may.

In both Byer and Incarnati, the juries were instructed in accordance with the decision of the Court of Appeals in Rusinek v Schultz, Snyder & Steele Lumber Co, 98 Mich…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. GavinMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Rusinek v. Schultz, Snyder & Steele Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Rusinek v. Schultz, Snyder & Steele Lumber Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Rusinek v. S, S & S LUMBER CO.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Incarnati v. SavageMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. DiFranco v. PickardMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Mielke v. WatermanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Horan v. BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Drake v. GordonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API