Legal Opinion

Rusinek v. Schultz, Snyder & Steele Lumber Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 1, 1980No. Docket No. 78-3137PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackenzie, J.

Plaintiffs filed a complaint against defendants for damages arising out of an auto accident which occurred on July 30, 1974. Plaintiff Eugene Rusinek claimed that he sustained a "serious impairment of body function” in the accident within the meaning of the Michigan no-fault act. His injuries consisted of a strained neck and back and a sore elbow. Plaintiff Marie Rusinek brought a claim based upon loss of consortium. Defendant Schultz, Snyder & Steele Lumber Company (hereinafter defendant) made a pretrial motion to dismiss Marie Rusinek’s loss of consortium claim arguing that it is not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Montgomery v. StephanMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Richman v. City of BerkleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Warner v. BrighamMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williams v. PayneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Byer v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Ouellette v. KenealyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Rusinek v. S, S & S LUMBER CO.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Incarnati v. SavageMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API