Rusinek v. Schultz, Snyder & Steele Lumber Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMackenzie, J.
Plaintiffs filed a complaint against defendants for damages arising out of an auto accident which occurred on July 30, 1974. Plaintiff Eugene Rusinek claimed that he sustained a "serious impairment of body function” in the accident within the meaning of the Michigan no-fault act. His injuries consisted of a strained neck and back and a sore elbow. Plaintiff Marie Rusinek brought a claim based upon loss of consortium. Defendant Schultz, Snyder & Steele Lumber Company (hereinafter defendant) made a pretrial motion to dismiss Marie Rusinek’s loss of consortium claim arguing that it is not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Montgomery v. StephanMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Richman v. City of BerkleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Warner v. BrighamMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
3Cited by5 opinions
- Williams v. PayneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Byer v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Ouellette v. KenealyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Rusinek v. S, S & S LUMBER CO.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Incarnati v. SavageMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982