Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Hilt Truck Line, Inc. v. Peterson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1983No. 82-310PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShanahan, J.

Hilt Truck Line, Inc. (Hilt), requested a writ of mandamus requiring the director of the Department of Motor Vehicles (department) to process Hilt’s application for proportional registration of its truck fleet pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-305.09 (Reissue 1978). The trial court denied the writ, finding that the director’s granting of a proportional registration is a discretionary duty. Hilt appeals, assigning as errors the court’s finding that issuance of the license was discretionary and the court’s failing to grant the writ of mandamus.

Hilt, a Nebraska corporation, is an interstate motor…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Little v. Board of County CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Singleton v. Kimball County Board of CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Riss & Co. v. BowersOhio Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. State ex rel. Andruss v. Mayor of North PlatteNebraska Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wieland v. BeermannNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State Ex Rel. Freezer Services, Inc. v. MullenNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State Ex Rel. Hilt Truck Line, Inc. v. JensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State Ex Rel. People for Responsible Omaha Urban Development v. ConleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Dozler v. ConradNebraska Court of Appeals · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API