Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Wieland v. Beermann

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1994No. S-94-897PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Per curiam

Relator, William A. Wieland, in this original action seeks a writ of mandamus compelling respondent, Allen J. Beermann, the Secretary of State of the State of Nebraska, to remove proposed Legislative Resolutions 2CA, 29CA, 277CA, 15CA, and 293CA from the November 8,1994, general election ballot. Wieland alleges in his first cause of action that Beermann accepted the explanatory statements which describe the proposed constitutional amendments after the statutory filing deadline, and thus must be compelled to remove the proposals from the ballot. We grant the petition and hereby order Beermann…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. OldfieldNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Jantzen v. Diller Telephone Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. McGinn v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. State v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State Ex Rel. Brant v. BeermannNebraska Supreme Court · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Geddes v. York CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Sydow v. City of Grand IslandNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Proctor v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & CasualtyNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State Ex Rel. Steinke v. LautenbaughNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State ex rel. Scherer v. Madison County CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API