Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. People for Responsible Omaha Urban Development v. Conley

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1990No. 88-515PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.

Mark Himes, a taxpayer, and an organization called People for Responsible Omaha Urban Development (PROUD) commenced this action against Fred Conley, the president of the Omaha City Council; the city council of the City of Omaha; and the City of Omaha (together, the City) to obtain a writ of mandamus. The Omaha Development Foundation intervened in the litigation.

In their petition filed March 8, 1988, the plaintiffs alleged that the Riverfront Redevelopment Plan, which was adopted by the city council on February 2, 1988, had been substantially modified from its first draft and that in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sasich v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Copple v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Singleton v. Kimball County Board of CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State Ex Rel. Hilt Truck Line, Inc. v. PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State Ex Rel. Nebraska State Council 32 v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Young v. Dodge County Board of SupervisorsNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Pratt v. Nebraska Board of ParoleNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Cain v. LymberNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State Ex Rel. Pederson v. HowellNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State Ex Rel. Scoular Properties, Inc. v. BemisNebraska Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API