Legal Opinion
Kinneary v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 13, 2008No. 04 Civ. 5183(VM)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Joseph Kinneary (“Kinneary”) brought this action against the City of New York (the “City”), and, individually, City employees Marsha Rothem (“Roth-em”), Zoe Ann Campbell (“Campbell”), and Louis Tazzi (“Tazzi”) (collectively, “City Defendants”). 1 Kinneary claimed violations by City Defendants of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (“ADA”), the New York State Human Rights Law, N.Y. Exec. Law § 296 et seq. (“NYSHRL”), and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Waffle House, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Richard Samuels v. Air Transport Local 504Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Gierlinger v. GleasonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Reiter v. MTA New York City Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Welch v. United Parcel Service Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Thomas v. Istar Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Mendez v. Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Thomas v. iStar Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Levitant v. City of New York Human Resources AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.