Legal Opinion

Barter v. General Motors Corp.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1975No. 76 (1974)PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The question on this appeal is whether, in a products-liability action, where a defective motor home, manufactured in Minnesota and subsequently sold by a third party in Wisconsin, caused injury to the Wisconsin plaintiffs in Iowa, the liability insurer of the manufacturer, who in Minnesota issued a policy containing a no-action clause, can, under the Wisconsin statutes, be sued and held liable in a direct-action suit brought in Wisconsin. We conclude that the Wisconsin statutes allow such suit and affirm the order of the circuit court denying the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dippel v. ScianoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Howes v. HansenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Schnabl v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Frye v. AngstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Shipman v. Kenosha Unified School District No. 1Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. D.L. Ex Rel. Friederichs v. HuebnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Ransome v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Shawver v. Roberts Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Mulhern v. Outboard Marine Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
  5. Christopherson v. Hyster Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API