Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Clay

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 8, 1988No. 01529PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMILIA, Judge:

Appellant David Clay appeals an April 29, 1987 Order which found him in need of treatment, supervision or rehabilitation and, pursuant to the Juvenile Act, 42 Pa.C.S. § 6301 et seq., ordered him to be committed to Cornwells Heights Youth Development Center, Sex Offender Program. This Order followed an April 14, 1987 adjudication of delinquency of appellant; the court stated that after a hearing, it found beyond a reasonable doubt appellant did commit the acts of possession of an instrument of crime and prohibited offensive weapon, aggravated assault, and rape.

The facts are as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KloiberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Commonwealth v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. WhitemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. SharpeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. In the Interest of DelSignoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McElrath v. CommonwealthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Matter of SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. In the Interest of SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. In the Interest of M.D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. In the Interest of M.H.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API