Legal Opinion

In the Interest of M.D.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 19, 2003PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

¶ 1 We address the question of whether an order entered after a juvenile review hearing, directing that the juvenile’s commitment be continued in the same treatment facility, is a final order subject to appeal. We conclude that it is not and so quash the appeal.

¶ 2 M.D., born in February of 1984, has a long history of mental health problems, including several involuntary commitments. When M.D. was fourteen he attacked his father (Father), with whom he was living, and was charged with simple assault by way of a juvenile petition for delinquency. A second petition charged M.D. with simple and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MasonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. In re N.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. In Re LoveSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. In the Interest of SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. In Interest of McDonoughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GainesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Commonwealth v. S.F.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. In the Interest of J.S.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. In the Interest of J.E.D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. GainesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API