Legal Opinion

In the Interest of M.H.M.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 23, 2004PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

GANTMAN, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, M.H.M., asks us to review the adjudication and dispositional order of the York County Court of Common Pleas, based on the offenses of possession of weapon on school property,1 criminal mischief,2 sale and use of air rifles,3 and paintball guns and paintball markers.4 *1253Specifically, Appellant challenges the court’s determination that a paintball gun constitutes a “weapon” under 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 912 and an “air rifle” under 18 Pa. C.S.A. § 6304. We hold a paint ball gun is a “weapon” and an “air rifle” under the respective statutes. Accordingly, we affirm…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Canvass of Absentee Ballots of Nov. 4, 2003 General ElectionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. BoothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Commonwealth v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. ReaserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Ramadan, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County2005
  2. In Re MHMSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. In the Int. of: K.G., Appeal of: K.G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. In the Int. of: K.G., Appeal of: K.G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  5. In the Int. of: T.R.H., a Minor Appeal of: T.R.H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API