De Wolf v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtPowell, P. J.
Now on this 1st day of April, 1953, there comes on for hearing a purported appeal by the petitioner, Carl Austin DeWolf, from an order of the district court of Tulsa county striking a motion for new trial from the files of said court by reason of lack of jurisdiction in said court to hear said motion. The motion was based on the ground of newly discovered evidence.
The Attorney General on behalf of the state has now filed herein a motion to strike and dismiss the petition in error, and appeal attempted to be filed in this court.
After considering the petition in error, the transcripts attached,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- De Wolf v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
- Gibson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
- DeWolf v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
- Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
- State v. KileCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tarter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1961