Legal Opinion
State v. Kile
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided November 12, 1952No. A-11724PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.
In this case the State charged Don C. Kile, Russell Nixon and C. B. McAllister by complaint or preliminary information filed in the court of Leslie W. Lisle, judge of the court of common pleas of Tulsa county, acting as an examining magistrate, with the crime of embezzlement. The prosecuting officers filed the charge, it seems, under provision of sec. 341, Tit. 21 O.S. 1951, a felony statute. The defendants were, of course, entitled to a preliminary hearing. Art. II, § 17, Const, of Okla.; Tit. 22 O.S. 1951, §§ 251-276, and the preliminary information was filed with Judge Lisle for that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McLellan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- Cress v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1918
- Pierro v. TurnerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
- Ridenour v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951
- Dansby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Allen v. District Court of Washington CountyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
- Nicodemus v. District Court of Oklahoma CountyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1970
- Moran v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1958
- Peters v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1961
- De Wolf v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.