Legal Opinion

Blue Cross-Blue Shield v. Jackson

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 1965No. 6 Div. 40PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CATES, Judge.

The facts in this civil case are taken from the appellant’s brief without •counter statement by appellee. Therefore, under Supreme Court Rule 9, last sentence, they are taken by us as accurate and suffi■cient.

The cause was originally assigned to JOPINSON, J., and his now dissenting opinion has further factual recitals.

The cause was tried below without the intervention of a jury. No transcript of testimony appears in the record before us. The judgment entry recites that the “case was submitted to the court on stipulated facts and jaleen under advisement.” We review without any…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Prudential Ins. Co. v. GraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  2. Bradley v. AndressSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  3. Shears v. All States Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  4. Aetna Life Ins. Co of Hartford, Conn. v. GullettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  5. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. KorneghyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Alabama v. FowlerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Zerance v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Alabama v. FowlerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Sheehan v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  5. Sheehan v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API