Daniel B. Katz & Associates Corp. v. Midland Rushmore, LLC
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*978The plaintiff commenced this action to recover fees allegedly earned in connection with the procurement of tenants for shopping centers located in Minnesota and South Dakota. The plaintiff also alleged, among other things, that the individual defendant tortiously interfered with the plaintiff’s contract, existing business relationships, and prospective business relationships when it made false statements in connection with one of these projects.
The defendants moved pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (8) to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. The plaintiff opposed the motion,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Fischbarg v. DoucetNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- McKee Electric Co. v. Rauland-Borg Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Laufer v. OstrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. v. Montana Board of InvestmentsNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Goel v. RamachandranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Pichardo v. ZayasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- America/International 1994 Venture v. MauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Whitcraft v. RunyonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Shalik v. ColemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.