Steven Bernard Boyd v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, District Judge:
Appellant Steven Boyd (“Boyd”), a federal prisoner, is appealing the denial of his fourth-in-time 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence from the Southern District of Georgia. 1 The district court dismissed Boyd’s motion finding that it was barred from review “by virtue of the successive motion restrictions enacted by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”), and now contained in 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255 and 2244(b).” See Report and Recommendation at 3 (internal citation omitted). Boyd argues on appeal that the district…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Panetti v. QuartermanSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Daniel Clark Medberry v. James CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Stewart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- In Re: Brad Bradley BradfordCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Albert Holland, Jr. v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Alfonso Ponton v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- Tyrus McNair v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Griham v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.