Legal Opinion
Mohnkern v. Professional Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 8, 2008No. 07-3486PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J., joined by Jordan, D.J.,
BATCHELDER, J. (pp. 163-69), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
OPINION
BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Janet Mohnkern brought suit claiming she was owed attorneys’ fees under Florida law by defendant The Professional Insurance Company. The district court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and Mohnkern now appeals that decision. We now AFFIRM.
I
The district court adequately recited the convoluted facts of this case:
This is one of a number of satellite cases spawned by the litigation in Liberte Capital Group et al v. Capwill, Case No. 5:99 CV 818 (N.D.Ohio)…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wollard v. Lloyd's & Companies of Lloyd'sSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Joseph Carleton Hardesty v. Hamburg TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Insurance Co. of North America v. LexowSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wuliger v. Manufacturers Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Borger v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Ganim v. Columbia Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Mohnkern v. Professional InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Richard Ganim, Jr. v. Columbia Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.