Legal Opinion
Ganim v. Columbia Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 23, 2009No. 08-3945PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge.
Richard Ganim contends that Columbia Casualty Company breached its insurance agreement in bad faith by refusing to defend him in an arbitration proceeding before the National Association of Securities Dealers. The district court determined that Columbia properly refused to defend because the allegations against Ganim did not state a claim potentially within the scope of the policy’s coverage. See Ganim v. Columbia Cas. Co., 2008 WL 2390776 (N.D.Ohio Jun.9, 2008). We agree and AFFIRM summary judgment in Columbia’s favor.
I
Richard Ganim began as a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zoppo v. Homestead InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Willoughby Hills v. Cincinnati InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Wedge Products, Inc. v. Hartford Equity Sales Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- Sanderson v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- Mohnkern v. Professional InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dish Network Corp. v. Arch Specialty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Certain Underwriters At Lloyds, London v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2019