Legal Opinion
Brodsky v. Perth Amboy National Bank
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 8, 1957No. Civ. A. No. 391-56PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORTENDYKE, District Judge.
In his complaint, filed in this action on May 14, 1956, plaintiff, a New York resident, and owner of certain shares of the capital stock of the defendant national bank, having its principal office in New Jersey, prayed that this Court adjudicate the invalidity of proceedings of the annual meeting of defendant’s stockholders, held on January 10, 1956, and the election of directors thereat, and that this Court order a new election of directors and direct that the plaintiff be permitted to vote his shares of stock at such new election. The defendant duly answered the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- National Bank v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Whitney v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Cooper v. O'CONNORCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- National Bank v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Niles-Bement-Pond Co. v. Iron Moulders Union Local No. 68Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Irving Brodsky v. The Perth Amboy National Bank, a Banking Corporation Organized Under the Laws of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Perth Amboy National Bank v. BrodskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Perth Amboy National Bank v. BrodskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962