Perth Amboy National Bank v. Brodsky
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Bank moves for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A., contending that there exists no genuine issue of material fact requiring trial and that, on the pleadings and moving papers, judgment should be granted in its favor as a matter of law.
Upon the basis of analogous assertions, defendants cross-move for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and granting judgment in their favor.
*786In the underlying action, plaintiff Bank seeks a declaratory judgment setting aside and declaring void the unexpired portion of a 21-year lease which it…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. PottorffSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- McCormick v. Market BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Awotin v. Atlas Exchange Nat. Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Wingert v. First Nat. Bank of HagerstownSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wirtz v. Savannah Bank & Trust Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1964