Legal Opinion
Applera Corp. v. MJ Research Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 30, 2005No. 3:98CV1201 (JBA)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON DOUBLE PATENTING
ARTERTON, District Judge.
A jury trial was held from March 4 to April 2, 2004 on Plaintiffs’ (collectively, “Applera”) claims that defendants MJ Research Inc., Michael Finney and John Fin-ney (collectively, “MJ”) infringed its thermal cycler and PCR process patents. On April 2, 2004, the jury returned its verdict, finding that defendants induced infringement of the PCR process patents; directly infringed claim 45 of U.S. Patent No. 5,333,675 (“ ’675”) and claims 1, 44, and 158 of U.S. Patent No. 5,475,610 (“ ’610”); and induced infringement of claim 16 of U.S. Patent…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- In Re Paolo LongiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Application of Virgil W. Vogel and Paul W. VogelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- General Foods Corporation v. Studiengesellschaft Kohle MbhCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Amgen, Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2008