King v. Jones
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.
Plaintiff filed an action for malpractice against defendants, partners in a law firm. The trial court granted a judgment on the pleadings in favor of defendants, and plaintiff appeals.
A motion for judgment on the pleadings is allowable only when the pleadings affirmatively show that plaintiff has no cause of action against the defendant, or when the defendant affirmatively alleges a complete defense which is admitted by the reply. Scott & Payne v. Potomac Ins. Co., 217 Or 323, 341 P2d 1083 (1959).
Plaintiff filed an original and two amended complaints. In her second amended complaint she…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Scott & Payne v. Potomac Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Milton v. HareOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Katzenberger v. BryanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
- Drury v. ButlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
3Cited by17 opinions
- Beeck v. KapalisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- George v. CatonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- Espinoza v. ThomasMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
- Arlington Funding Services, Inc. v. GeigelSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2009
- Edmondson v. DressmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.