Legal Opinion

McBride v. Cowan

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 22, 1923No. 12906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court sustaining a demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence. The suit was brought by.plaintiff in error, McBride, to set aside a default judgment for $3,000, which in a previous suit, defendant in error, Bert Cowan, had obtained against plaintiff in error, McBride, for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by Cowan, while in the employ of McBride, as a well driller, and to have been caused by McBride’s negligence.

A review of the proceedings in the damage suit of Cowan against McBride is nec-essaiT' to a determination of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wagner v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. McIntosh v. HoltgraveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Laithe v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  4. El Reno Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. SuttonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Scott v. AbrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vacuum Oil Co. v. BrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Latson v. EatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  3. Metzger v. TurnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. Neff v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Webster v. Oklahoma Railway Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API