Legal Opinion

Paramo v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1995No. 94-143PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice.

A jury found appellant guilty of taking or passing a controlled substance into a jail. In the face of hard evidence, appellant repaired to a lesser included offense argument in an effort to mitigate the damage done by his deeds. Finding no necessarily included lesser offense, we affirm the judgment and sentence of the district court,

I. ISSUES

Appellant articulates the following issues:

I. Is possession of a controlled substance under Wyo.Stat. § 35-7-1031(c) a lesser included offense of taking or passing a controlled substance into a jail under Wyo.Stat. § 6-5-208?

II. Was the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. Philip Berrigan, in No. 72-1938, and Elizabeth McAlister Appeal of Elizabeth McAlister InCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  3. Wilson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. KefferWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Stauffer Chemical Co. v. CurryWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Fertig v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Heywood v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Andrews v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State of Iowa v. Jillian Jane StewartSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  5. Miller v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API