Paramo v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TAYLOR, Justice.
A jury found appellant guilty of taking or passing a controlled substance into a jail. In the face of hard evidence, appellant repaired to a lesser included offense argument in an effort to mitigate the damage done by his deeds. Finding no necessarily included lesser offense, we affirm the judgment and sentence of the district court,
I. ISSUES
Appellant articulates the following issues:
I. Is possession of a controlled substance under Wyo.Stat. § 35-7-1031(c) a lesser included offense of taking or passing a controlled substance into a jail under Wyo.Stat. § 6-5-208?
II. Was the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Philip Berrigan, in No. 72-1938, and Elizabeth McAlister Appeal of Elizabeth McAlister InCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Wilson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. KefferWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Stauffer Chemical Co. v. CurryWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Fertig v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Heywood v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Andrews v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- State of Iowa v. Jillian Jane StewartSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- Miller v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.