Cain v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELKINGTON, J.
On this appeal we are called upon to determine the appropriate statute of limitations, and the point at which it starts running, on an action for damages for violation of one’s right to privacy. The latter question appears to be one of first impression.
Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) had insured the automobile of plaintiff Bing Woo Jew (“Bing”). While occupied by Bing and plaintiff Elaine Cain (“Cain”), the vehicle was involved in an accident in which Cain was injured. In a subsequent action by Cain against Bing his conflicting…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- G. D. Searle & Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Noble v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTVCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Bernson v. Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Slack v. Kanawha County Housing & Redevelopment AuthorityWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
- Leaf v. City of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Moreno v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.