Legal Opinion

United States v. Jones

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided June 17, 1992No. 66,478; NMCM 90 1516PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

COX, Judge:

This case requires us to decide if a military judge may correct a sentence after adjournment of the court-martial to add 6 months’ confinement. We must also decide *271if appellant’s guilty pleas were provident when the military judge did not explain fully the concept of “exclusive and concurrent federal jurisdiction” in a prosecution for an offense assimilated under the Assimilative Crimes Act.

We hold that the sentence cannot be upwardly corrected after adjournment of the court-martial, even to correct clear errors in announcement of the sentence. We further hold…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. DavenportUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  3. United States v. KlineUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  4. United States v. BakerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. United States v. RedlinskiCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  2. United States v. SchellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
  3. United States v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
  4. United States v. GosselinCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  5. United States v. WatkinsU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API