United States v. Jones
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
COX, Judge:
This case requires us to decide if a military judge may correct a sentence after adjournment of the court-martial to add 6 months’ confinement. We must also decide *271if appellant’s guilty pleas were provident when the military judge did not explain fully the concept of “exclusive and concurrent federal jurisdiction” in a prosecution for an offense assimilated under the Assimilative Crimes Act.
We hold that the sentence cannot be upwardly corrected after adjournment of the court-martial, even to correct clear errors in announcement of the sentence. We further hold…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. DavenportUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. KlineUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. BakerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
3Cited by49 opinions
- United States v. RedlinskiCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
- United States v. SchellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
- United States v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
- United States v. GosselinCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- United States v. WatkinsU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.