Yurs v. Director of Labor
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Seidenfeld
These are appeals from judgment orders in consolidated Administrative Review Actions affirming the decision of the Director of Labor of the State of Illinois that Margaret Stover, an organist, was an employee of the plaintiffs under the Unemployment Compensation Act of Illinois.
The case requires construction of sections 206 and 212 of the Unemployment Compensation Act, defining “Employment.” Section 206 provides, as material here, as follows:
“. . . ‘employment’ means . . . any service after June 30, 1940 performed by an individual for an employing unit . . .” (Ill Rev Stats 1965, c 48, § 316.)
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bartels v. BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Zelney v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
- Zehender & Factor, Inc. v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
- A. George Miller, Inc. v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
- Ross v. CumminsIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Athol Daily News v. Board of Review of the Division of Employment & TrainingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Mattatuck Museum-Mattatuck Historical Society v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Latimer v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Carey v. GateHouse Media Massachusetts I, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
- Daw's Critical Care Registry, Inc. v. Department of LaborConnecticut Superior Court · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.