Legal Opinion
Shamshoum v. Bombay Cafe
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 14, 2003No. Civil 02-4276(JBS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSEN, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Presently before the court is the plaintiffs’ motion to admit counsel pro hac vice pursuant to Local Civil Rule 101.1(c). After having considered the submissions of the parties, the plaintiffs’ motion to admit counsel pro hac vice shall be granted.
II. BACKGROUND
On February 20, 2003, Jerald G. Abrams, Esquire, attorney for the plaintiffs, filed a motion to admit Lee Nuwesra, Esquire, as counsel for the plaintiffs in the instant matter. Mr. Abrams is an attorney associated with the law firm of Lee Nuwesra, LLC. (Affidavit of Jerald…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Iselin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Sale v. Haitian Centers Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Frazier v. HeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re LindseyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- In re CarrUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018