Legal Opinion
Rucks-Brandt Construction Co. v. Price
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 18, 1933No. 24099PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwindall, J.
The record in this ease discloses that plaintiff, Rucks-Brandt Construction Company, was a construction contractor, and while engaged in constructing a building in Oklahoma City had employed C. O. Silver as a brick mason foreman. Sil-vi-i was injured in an ant-n.chile accident and filed his claim for compensation before the State Industrial Commission, whore an award was rendered to him for 500 weeks. Plaintiff had a v, orkmen’s c..n pensation insurance policy covering its operations with the Southern Surety Company, which company, through its attorneys, appeared on its own and on plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carstens v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Consolidated Fuel Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- City of Guthrie v. StandleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Ashton v. Board of Com'rs of Murray CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Buckner v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Amerada Petroleum Corp. v. HesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Paull v. Preston Theatres Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1942
- Rucks-Brandt Construction Corp. v. SilverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Pioneer Mills Co. v. WebsterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.