Legal Opinion

Launer v. Griffen

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 30, 1943No. Civ. 6945PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

Defendants, the California and Arizona administrators of the estate of plaintiff’s deceased husband,- appeal from a judgment quieting plaintiff’s title to certain real property situated in the county of Sacramento, and denying similar relief on their cross-complaint. The property in question was acquired in 1926 by plaintiff and her deceased husband as joint tenants with right of survivorship.

Subsequently plaintiff and her husband moved to the State of Arizona where, during the fall of 1938, Adolph Launer instituted an action for divorce. His complaint alleged, among other things, “that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Fall v. EastinSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Siberell v. SiberellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Taylor v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Young v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Rauer's Collection Co. v. HigginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Rozan v. RozanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. King v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Estate of JamesonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Burnand v. IrigoyenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API