Lechner v. Village of Newark
New York Supreme Court
Demubbeb to the complaint upon the ground that it. does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
1Opinion of the CourtWebneb, J.
The defendant is a village, deriving its legal status as such under chapter 74 of the Laws of 1885.,
This action is brought to recover damages for injhries sustained by the plaintiff on the-1st day of. October, 1893, in a collision with one William Faliy who was riding a bicycle upon the sidewalks of said village, in pursuance of a license granted to. him by the village authorities, under an .ordinance passed by the trustees on or about the- 1st day of August, 1893. This Ordinance established a system .of registration, .for which a. small fee was charged, and in consideration of which the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cohen v. . Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Holland v. BartchIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by4 opinions
- People ex rel. Kieley v. LentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Lee v. City of Port HuronMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Gagnier v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
- Lotempio v. City of Niagara FallsNew York Supreme Court · 1938