Legal Opinion

Gagnier v. City of Fargo

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1902PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Cass County; Pollock, J. Action by N. D. Gagnier against the city of Fargo. Verdict for plaintiff. From an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

On October 18, 1899, the plaintiff was riding oh his bicycle on the sidewalks of the defendant city, and was thrown therefrom and injured. He brings this action to recover damages for such injury. The complaint alleges that the city “negligently suffered and permitted the sidewalk on which the injury occurred to be and remain unsafe, unsuitable and insufficient for the public use and travel thereon,” and that such sidewalk was “rendered unsafe, unsuitable, and insufficient * * * by reason of the fact that many bricks had been removed therefrom, leaving a large, deep, and dangerous hole…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jones v. City of WilliamsburgSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
  2. Holland v. BartchIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Leslie v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Ludlow v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Swift v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Belt v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  2. City of Grand Forks v. PaulsnessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Gagnier v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Braatz v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Lund v. UphamNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API