Legal Opinion
Brown v. Crandall
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 12, 2011No. A129543PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MARCHIANO, P. J.
Plaintiff Chelsey Brown (Brown) seeks a writ of mandamus compelling defendants Phillip Crandall, as Director of the Humboldt *5County Department of Health and Human Services, and the Humboldt County Board of Supervisors (collectively, the County) to offer medical coverage to her and other indigent residents deemed ineligible for the County Medical Services Program (CMSP), in accordance with the County’s duty to provide medical care to all indigent residents not otherwise “supported and relieved.” (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 17000.)1 She appeals from a judgment of dismissal…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
- Schifando v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Davey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Common Cause v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Baldwin v. AAA Northern California, Nevada & Utah Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Nathan G. v. Clovis Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Sierra Club v. Department of Parks & RecreationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Giles v. San Joaquin Valley Rehabilitation HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Huitt v. TEVA Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.