Legal Opinion
United States v. City of Pittsburgh
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 5, 1985No. 84-3353PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Circuit Judge.
The defendants, the City of Pittsburgh and its treasurer Stephen Schillo (collectively the “City”), appeal from an order granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, the United States and Jordan Lilienthal. 589 F.Supp. 179. The order declared that Jordan Lilienthal, a federal court reporter, was not subject to the City’s business privilege tax. Subject matter jurisdiction in the district court was asserted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1345 (1982). This court has appellate jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1982).
I
The following facts are…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- County of Allegheny v. Frank Mashuda Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Environmental ResourcesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. MuirCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Planned Parenthood of Central New Jersey v. VernieroDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Coast Cities Truck Sales, Inc. v. Navistar International Transportation Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- Jefferson County v. AckerDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.