Rosborough v. Chelan County, Wash.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
The above-entitled appeals were taken separately and on separate transcripts, but, by agreement of counsel, were briefed and argued together. With exception of the description of tho land, tho points involved are practically identical, and we will, therefore, deal with the two eases in a single opinion.
The proceedings were in eminent domain, instituted by Chelan county, Wash., in the superior court of that county, and removed to the United States District Court upon the application of appellants, who are residents of the city of Philadelphia, Pa. In the petition for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Douglass and Others v. Reynolds and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- State ex rel. Utick v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Cain v. Commercial Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
- City of Winchester v. RingIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
- Davidson Bros. Marble Co. v. United States Ex Rel. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- National Surety Co. of New York v. UlmenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- National Surety Co. of New York v. UlmenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933