Legal Opinion
Stultz v. Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided August 5, 2015No. Civil Action No. 7:13CV00589PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GLEN E. CONRAD, Chief Judge.
This case is presently before the court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons stated in open court on July 2, 2015, and for those set forth below, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
Background
The following facts, taken from the plaintiffs amended complaint, are accepted as true for purposes of the defendants’ motion to dismiss. See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94, 127 S.Ct. 2197, 167 L.Ed.2d 1081 (2007).
Plaintiff David Lee Stultz was employed by the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Supinger v. VirginiaDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2016