Henopp v. Wing

—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The determination that petitioner willfully and without good cause failed to attend a “Pathways” meeting that was required as a condition of his receipt of public assistance benefits is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Botting v Wing, 261 AD2d 901; Matter of McIntosh v Wing, 256 AD2d 1246; Matter of Poole v Wing, 256 AD2d 1217; Matter of Sutton v Wing, 249 AD2d 945; Matter of Vicari v Wing, 244 AD2d 974; see generally, Social Services Law § 342; 18 NYCRR 351.20, 351.21, 351.22 [b]; 351.26).…