MATTER OF JESSUP v. D'Elia
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.
Petitioner’s application for a grant of Aid to Dependent Children on behalf of her minor son was properly denied by respondents on the ground that petitioner possessed an automobile valued in excess of the statutory and regulatory $1,500 maximum (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981, Pub L 97-35, 42 USC §602 [a] [7] [B]; 45 CFR 233.20 [a] [3]; 18 NYCRR 352.23 [b] [2]). We reject petitioner’s reliance on Matter of Gunn v Blum (48 NY2d 58) because under these circumstances, that holding…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bernstein v. ToiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Gunn v. BlumNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Jones v. BlumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Jones v. BlumNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cannistra v. County of PutnamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Corrigan v. DiGuardiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Couch v. PeralesNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Porter v. D'EliaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Brennin v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.