Legal Opinion

Poole v. Wing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The determination that petitioner willfully and without good cause failed to comply with the requirements of the Job Opportunities and Basic Skills Training Program (JOBS program) is supported by substantial evidence (see, 18 NYCRR former 385.19 [c]; Matter of Vicari v Wing, 244 AD2d 974). “Ineligibility for assistance continues until the applicant agrees to comply with the requirements and demonstrates such compliance where appropriate” (18 NYCRR former 385.19 [a]). “An individual is deemed not to have…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Vicari v. WingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Henopp v. WingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Rosencrants v. WingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Dedeaux v. WingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API