Legal Opinion

Herzberger v. Barrow

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 30, 1904No. Gen. No. 11,827PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Proceeding to restrain collection of judgment. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Marcus Kavanagh, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ball

Appellants bring here for review the action of the learned chancellor in ordering an injunction to issue. The facts alleged in the bill as ground for this action are not denied. The appeal is based upon the face of the bill. The case stands as if appellants had demurred. It follows that whatever is well pleaded in the bill must be considered as true. Thus viewed, a case of fraud, oppression and of legal misconduct is presented which calls for relief. It appears that the first judgment was obtained against William Barrow without his being served with summons or being notified in any other way…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Owens v. RansteadIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Fitzgerald v. KimballIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Hickey v. StoneIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Eberhardt v. Pennsylvania Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1884

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lincoln Trust & Savings Bank v. NelsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931
  2. O'Beirne v. City of ElginAppellate Court of Illinois · 1914
  3. Florin v. RaymanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  4. Mohr v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  5. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co. v. Cook Lumber Terminal Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API