Legal Opinion

Mohr v. Smith

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 19, 1912No. Gen. No. 18,917Published

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Clarence N. Goodwin, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1912.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely

It is first urged as ground for reversal that complainants have a full and adequate defense in a suit at law. The bill, however, seeks an accounting of funds said to have been wrongfully collected by Smith as secret commissions and profits, in violation of a position of trust and confidence, which funds have in part come into the hands of the other defendants, with knowledge of the facts and without consideration. It has been held repeatedly that courts of equity will take jurisdiction for the purpose of compelling an accounting by one standing in a fiduciary or confidential relation who is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Roby v. ColehourIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Coryell v. KlehmIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Campbell v. Paris & Decatur RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Herzberger v. BarrowAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API