Legal Opinion
Application of Ralph G. H. Siu
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 25, 1955No. Patent Appeal 6097PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the Patent Office affirming the rejection by the Primary Examiner of claims 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, and 9 of appellant’s application, for a patent on “Curled Glass Filaments and Methods of Making the Same.” Claim 5 was allowed. Only method claims are here on appeal.
Claim 1 is illustrative of the subject matter defined by the rejected claims and reads as follows:
“1. A method of preparing filaments of glass characterized by causing molten glass to flow in a liquid stream to the vertex of a substantially cone-shaped, heated,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Underwood v. GerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Plax Corp. v. Elmer E. Mills Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- Plax Corp. v. Elmer E. Mills Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1952
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gemveto Jewelry Co., Inc. v. Jeff Cooper Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Edwid E. Hays and Wallace & Tiernan, Inc. v. Edward J. Brenner, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- C-Thru Products, Inc. v. Uniflex, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1966
- EJ Brooks Co. v. Stoffel Seals CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Sterling Varnish Company v. Louis Allis CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1957