Commonwealth v. Dzewiacin
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.
Evidence was introduced tending to show that- on the date alleged in the complaint the defendant operated a motor 'vehicle and carried therein a receptacle containing distilled spirits. The defendant moved that a directed verdict in his favor be ordered. This motion was denied. The jury found the defendant guilty. .
The defendant contends that the transportation of distilled spirits in the manner shown is not an offence. By G. L. c. 138, | 2, the sale or keeping for sale of intoxicating liquor is prohibited. By St. 1923, c. 370, no person shall transport “by air craft, water craft or vehicle”…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Crane v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Miller v. HortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Commonwealth v. NickersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Commonwealth v. MixerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gallagher v. WheelerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Commonwealth v. MaraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- E. J. Fitzwilliam Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Commonwealth v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Commonwealth v. Certain Intoxicating LiquorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.