Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Dzewiacin

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 16, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

Evidence was introduced tending to show that- on the date alleged in the complaint the defendant operated a motor 'vehicle and carried therein a receptacle containing distilled spirits. The defendant moved that a directed verdict in his favor be ordered. This motion was denied. The jury found the defendant guilty. .

The defendant contends that the transportation of distilled spirits in the manner shown is not an offence. By G. L. c. 138, | 2, the sale or keeping for sale of intoxicating liquor is prohibited. By St. 1923, c. 370, no person shall transport “by air craft, water craft or vehicle”…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Crane v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Miller v. HortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Commonwealth v. NickersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  5. Commonwealth v. MixerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gallagher v. WheelerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Commonwealth v. MaraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. E. J. Fitzwilliam Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  4. Commonwealth v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  5. Commonwealth v. Certain Intoxicating LiquorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API