Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mixer

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 30, 1910PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, J.

This complaint under St. 1906, c. 421, charges the defendant with illegally transporting intoxicating liquor into the city of Lynn, where no licenses of the first five classes for the sale of intoxicating liquor and no permits to transport such liquor into the city had been granted. The defendant, a driver in the employ of a common carrier, had upon his load for transportation in Lynn a sugar barrel, not marked by the seller or consignor as required by R. L. c. 100, § 49, for packages containing intoxicating liquor. There was nothing about the appearance of the barrel to cause suspicion as to…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Scott v. DonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Parrot v. Wells, Fargo & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Keller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Commonwealth v. EmmonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  5. Commonwealth v. Peoples Express Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Young v. DuncanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Commonwealth v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Attorney General v. TuftsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  5. People Ex Rel. Price v. Sheffield Farms-Slawson-Decker Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API