Hair Associates, Inc. v. National Hair Replacement Services, Inc.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

BRENNEMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. Introduction.

This trademark infringement action was tried without a jury on April 23 through April 26,1996. Near the close of defendants’ proofs on April 26, plaintiff raised an objection to the testimony of defendants’ final witness, a damages expert. The issue was ultimately resolved by permitting the parties to conduct additional discovery with regard to damage issues and the parties submitted additional damage proofs by way of deposition transcripts. The court heard final closing arguments on November…