Legal Opinion

Drusedum v. Guernaccini

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 2, 1977No. 808PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN der VOORT, Judge:

This is a dispute between property owners in a recorded plan of lots over their respective rights in a street which was shown on a recorded plot plan but not accepted by the municipality as a public street within the 21 year limit prescribed by § 1724 of the Borough Code, 53 P.S. § 46724, and predecessor statutes. An attempt by the borough in a 1971 ordinance to accept the street as a public thoroughfare was held to be invalid because not made within 21 years of the filing of the plan: Guernaccini v. Lansdale Borough, 95 Montgomery County, L.R. 299 (1972).

Appellants and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rahn v. HessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. First National Bank v. PaffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  3. Brodt v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Appeal of FergusonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  5. Piro v. ShipleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Potis v. CoonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Riek v. BinnieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Elliott v. H. B. Alexander & Son, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Federal Kemper Insurance v. DerrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Leininger v. TrapizonaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API