Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

Justice Court of Town of Perinton

Decided October 3, 1994PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Gary W. Rood, J.

Both of the above defendants are represented by the same defense counsel. Each defendant is charged with various violations of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, including common-law driving while intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [3]). With the consent of the parties, the court has temporarily joined these cases for the purpose of considering and deciding the defendants’ respective motions to dismiss because of the similar questions of law involved.

Defendant Smith is charged with common-law driving while intoxicated and several traffic infractions by…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. KeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. People v. NuccioNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. People v. WeinbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. People v. HohmeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. RossNew York Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. QuarlesRochester City Court · 1996
  3. People v. BornJustice Court of Town of Perinton · 1995
  4. People v. CurtisJustice Court of Town of Perinton · 1995
  5. People v. KrenzerRochester City Court · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API